Evolution and carbon 14 dating Free sex hook up chats rooms
Mollusks, unlike plants et al., get the carbon for their shells from ancient carbonate and not the atmosphere. Therefore mollusk shells are inappropriate for carbon dating because they do not, even when alive, have C-14 at the level present in the atmosphere.The level of C-14 in mollusk shells reflects their source of carbonate.If radiocarbon lasts only a few hundred thousand years, why is it found in all the earth’s diamonds dated at billions of years old?The radiocarbon ages of all fossils and coal should be reduced to less than 5,000 years, matching the timing of their burial during the Flood.When scientists fail to account for so many more plants and animals in the pre-Flood biosphere and wrongly assume that plants buried in coal beds had the same proportion of carbon-14 as plants do today, their radiocarbon dating yields “ages” much higher than the true Flood age of about 4,350 years.
The result is that carbon 14 is present as a constant percentage of the total carbon in the atmosphere, although it does change slightly depending upon the amount of cosmic radiation reaching the atmosphere.This is the motivation behind the 30,000 year figure quoted in the creationist position.Creationists attack all radioactive dating with the claim that radioactive decay rates may have been different in the past.The same is true of animals that eat plant material.When these organisms die, they no longer ingest C-14 (directly or indirectly) from an atmospheric source.
Carbon-14 dating is a method, based on unprovable assumptions about the past, used to date things that contain carbon (e.g. It can only give maximum ages of around 50,000 years and yet C-14 has been found in fossils and diamonds thought to be millions and billions of years old respectively.